grading

Will BigLaw Embrace Grade-Less, High-Pedigree JDs?

Ed. note: The following article comes to Ms. JD courtesy of author Michael Estrin and bitterlawyer.com.  They interviewed a number of hiring partners at major U.S. law firms, who expressed concern about decisions by Harvard and Stanford law schools to switch to a pass/fail system.  This article might be of interest to many Ms. JD readers, especially given past issues and discussions concerning the compatibility between current law school learning frameworks and female law students.

Class rank is everything. It separates the future scholars from the posers; the potential Big Firm Partners from the 9-to-5 government slackers. If there were no grades, there’d be no way to differentiate among prospects and the entire legal hiring system would implode. Or maybe not.

In the past year, Stanford and Harvard have adopted a pass/fail grading system similar to Yale’s. This means no more grades at three of the top five U.S. law schools. Does this make sense? Are the schools doing the “real world” a favor or a disfavor? Does the elimination of competition from a highly-competitive profession make any sense whatsoever?

    Syndicate content

    Login (to blog or comment)

    Corporate Sponsors

    Arnold & Porter LLP
    Covington & Burling LLP
    Kirkland & Ellis LLP
    Latham & Watkins LLP
    Legal Momentum
    McDermott Will & Emery LLP
    McGuireWoods LLP
    Northwestern Law School
    Sidley Austin LLP
    Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz

    * denotes a founding sponsor

    Other Sponsors

    Shop Ms. JD

    Thanks to all who voted!

    Top law blogs award
    The ABA Blawg 100

    The ABA Blawg 100



    The 2007 Weblog Awards

    Join the Club. Follow the Feed.