<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://ms-jd.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>beauty</title>
 <link>http://ms-jd.org/tag/beauty</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Congressional Babes</title>
 <link>http://ms-jd.org/congressional-babes</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Last week on &lt;a href=&quot;http://feministe.us/blog&quot;&gt;my blog&lt;/a&gt; we had a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/03/01/women-who-make-us-cringe/&quot;&gt;short conversation&lt;/a&gt; about hyper-sexualized younger women, and why coming down on them is a little bit unfair. Now, the LA Times gives us &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/local/politics/cal/la-me-sanchez05mar05,0,3865811.story?coll=la-home-headlines&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; about Rep. Loretta Sanchez, a Congresswoman who is, according to the paper, is being &quot;tested on whether her reputation will be more coquette or congresswoman.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because Lord knows the earth would shatter if she were both a female politician and a human being.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ms-jd.org/congressional-babes&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://ms-jd.org/congressional-babes#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://ms-jd.org/topic/issues/women-and-law-media">Women and Law in the Media</category>
 <category domain="http://ms-jd.org/tag/beauty">beauty</category>
 <category domain="http://ms-jd.org/tag/feminism">feminism</category>
 <category domain="http://ms-jd.org/tag/gender">gender</category>
 <category domain="http://ms-jd.org/tag/politics">politics</category>
 <pubDate>Tue,  6 Mar 2007 19:22:46 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jill Filipovic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">168 at http://ms-jd.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
