<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://ms-jd.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Academia</title>
 <link>http://ms-jd.org/tag/academia</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Off Track in Academia</title>
 <link>http://ms-jd.org/track-academia</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;While I can&amp;#39;t pretend to be in the know about the gender politics of legal academia, an&lt;a href=&quot;http://insidehighered.com/news/2008/06/12/women&quot;&gt; interesting study&lt;/a&gt; was brought to my attention by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://feministlawprofs.law.sc.edu/?p=3647&quot;&gt;FeministLawProfs today&lt;/a&gt;.  The study, the largest of its kind, found that&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;[Women academics] are deeply frustrated by a system that they believe undervalues their work and denies them opportunities for a balanced life. While the study found some overt discrimination in the form of harassment or explicitly sexist remarks, many of the concerns involved more subtle “deeply entrenched inequities.&amp;quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even as somebody who is not involved in academia, I have always been keenly aware of the higher percentage of women in the non-tenure track positions and in positions of service, such as assistant deanships and counselors.  I recently had a discussion with an aspiring professor who informed me that many women take non-tenure track positions just to get their foot in the door of academia later to find out that it is nearly impossible to jump from one track to the other.  This is very similar to the track of &amp;quot;staff attorney&amp;quot; which is a non-partnership track at many large firms.  There too, it is nearly impossible to jump the tracks.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the similarities between the numbers for women in academia and law firms are striking.  Believe it or not, in a statement criticizing the study, the university at which the author of the study works said this about it the progress of women on its faculty:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Women account for 43 percent of assistant professors, 37 percent of associate professors, and 22 percent of full professors. Those figures are going up in science and technology fields too, [the school] noted, and women now are 37 percent of assistant professors, 31 percent of associate professors and 18 percent of full professors in those disciplines.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boy, this &amp;quot;progress&amp;quot; looks very similar to law firm numbers where women are 47% of junior associates and 18% of partners.  Hmmmm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ms-jd.org/track-academia&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://ms-jd.org/track-academia#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://ms-jd.org/topic/careers/legal-academia">Legal Academia</category>
 <category domain="http://ms-jd.org/tag/academia">Academia</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:03:19 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Peg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">859 at http://ms-jd.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dean Elena Kagan: Status Report on Women in the Legal Profession</title>
 <link>http://ms-jd.org/dean-elena-kagan-status-report-women-legal-profession</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Greetings—and congratulations to all—on the launch of Ms. JD! A little over a year ago, I prepared a sort of “status report” on women and the legal profession for a talk I had the honor of delivering at the Association of the Bar of the City of New York. It was a terrific opportunity to reflect on both the tremendous strides already made and the great way still to go. In hopes that some may find these thoughts of interest, I’m delighted to share them &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/abnyspeech/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ms-jd.org/dean-elena-kagan-status-report-women-legal-profession&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://ms-jd.org/dean-elena-kagan-status-report-women-legal-profession#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://ms-jd.org/topic/features/first-women">First Women</category>
 <category domain="http://ms-jd.org/tag/academia">Academia</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 01:55:16 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elena Kagan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">228 at http://ms-jd.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Professor Judith T. Younger, First Woman</title>
 <link>http://ms-jd.org/professor-judith-t-younger-first-woman</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I’m delighted to be here in such distinguished company. I’m not sure that being a “first” is really as notable as being a “best” but in the spirit of this endeavor, I will admit to being the first woman dean of Syracuse College of Law. I may have been the first woman dean of a law school in New York State as well. I’m pretty sure that I was the first dean of any sex whose resignation from the deanship was covered on the front page of The New York Times. (N.Y. Times, April 8, 1975).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ms-jd.org/professor-judith-t-younger-first-woman&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://ms-jd.org/professor-judith-t-younger-first-woman#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://ms-jd.org/topic/features/first-women">First Women</category>
 <category domain="http://ms-jd.org/tag/academia">Academia</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:26:50 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Judith T. Younger</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">205 at http://ms-jd.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
