<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://ms-jd.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Practice Areas</title>
 <link>http://ms-jd.org/tag/practice-areas</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>AmLaw thinks practice area matters a lot (more) for female lawyers. Discuss.</title>
 <link>http://ms-jd.org/amlaw-thinks-practice-area-matters-lot-more-female-lawyers-discuss</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Following up on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1166609205006&quot; target=&quot;new&quot;&gt;&quot;Obstacle Course&quot; in the American Lawyer&lt;/a&gt; (which the WSJ’s &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.wsj.com/law/&quot; target=&quot;new&quot;&gt;Law Blog&lt;/a&gt; has linked and commented on the article in their post &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/01/09/women-litigators-battle-adversaries-and-stereotypes/&quot;&gt;Women Litigators Battle Adversity and Stereotypes&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ms-jd.org/amlaw-thinks-practice-area-matters-lot-more-female-lawyers-discuss&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://ms-jd.org/amlaw-thinks-practice-area-matters-lot-more-female-lawyers-discuss#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://ms-jd.org/topic/careers/firms-and-private-sector">Firms and the Private Sector</category>
 <category domain="http://ms-jd.org/tag/amlaw">AmLaw</category>
 <category domain="http://ms-jd.org/tag/interviewing">Interviewing</category>
 <category domain="http://ms-jd.org/tag/practice-areas">Practice Areas</category>
 <pubDate>Fri,  2 Feb 2007 01:34:08 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Manamana</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">59 at http://ms-jd.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
