Nonprofits and the Public Interest

Ms. JD Announces its Public Interest Law Scholarships!

Ms. JD is pleased to be offering two $500 scholarships for law students working in public interest this summer. Unpaid judicial externs also qualify for these scholarships. This year's essay topic asks applicants to discuss myths about being a law student. Did you experience any pleasant surprises upon starting your study of law? Did you learn any law school 'lessons' the hard way? Ms. JD wants to hear about them. Applications are due no later than June 1st. More information is available at http://ms-jd.org/ms-jd-2008-summer-scholarship-application (you must be logged in in order to apply).

Unintended Consequences and Using the All-Mighty Dollar as a Carrot

There has been a lot of buzz in the blawg-o-sphere this week about Harvard Law School's announcement that it will waive 3L tuition for those going to work for the government or public interest for the five years after law school. I think this news is great. And as Professor Volokh points out, because HLS is a trendsetter among law schools, this just may spark a little healthly competition aimed at loan forgiveness policies amoung elite law schools. Feeling the squeeze of law students loans myself, I would be all for that.

However, what about the possibility of unintended consequences? Today on the Environmental and Urban Economics Blog, Professor Kahn explores the possiblity that this initiative may hinder the representation of women in law firm leadership down the road. The first step to his hypothesis is an assumption that women will take this deal in larger numbers than men. He writes, and I tend to agree that:

Liberal students will be more likely to accept this deal. Will women at HLS be more likely to take this offer? While I have no evidence for this claim, my intuition is telling me that the answer is yes.

In the second logic step, Professor Kahn points out that more women taking this deal to go into public or government service will necessarily mean that fewer go to work at law firms sooner or later as it is very difficult to go to a big law firm after 5 years in public service or the government. This is both for the practical reasons and the pragmatic point that few would want to go to big law after 5 years of public service.

[Continues after the jump]

Social networking for women NGO activists and their clients

PulseWire is in beta testing, open for women who are working in the fields of human trafficking, HIV/AIDS, and water sustainability. Could that be you?

[More after the jump]

Why Do Women Dominate Public Interest?

I was poking around the Perspectives magazine articles available online, and I came across An Eye-Opening Tool for Wide-Eyed Law Students, a piece last year about the Equal Justice Works ranking of law schools by their public interest programs. I found two things interesting about the article. First, the approximately 27% of law graduates who enter public interest has remained fairly static since the 1980s. Second, women are presumed to benefit more from pressure on law schools to provide more support for public interest job hunting since women are more likely to take public interest jobs (the article cites a study that roughly 6% of women graduates go into public interest while only roughly 3% of men do--don't ask me why 6+3 doesn't equal 27%, apparently the stats cited in the article are from different data or counting different types of jobs as public interest).

Hanging out my own shingle: what being Ms. JD means to me

My summer internship is over. I spent 10 weeks totally immersed in public interest law, and as a result I have completely changed what I had so carefully planned to do after graduation. No longer do I plan to remain an academic, nor do I wish to pursue a job at a large firm. More than likely I will open a solo practice so I can do public interest law.

 

Avoiding burnout on the Death Row defense bar

Each week during our internship, the legal staff has an “Intern CLE,” or some sort of legal lecture. Sometimes we watch a video on some aspect of public interest law, followed by a Q&A with an attorney practicing in that field. It may be someone working in criminal defense, legal aid, a lobbyist, or a legislative aide. We even watched Good Night, and Good Luck. The interns get to learn a little about other areas of public interest law, and can network with attorneys in other non-profits. And it serves as a little break in an otherwise intensive work week.

We were fortunate to have Rob Owen, clinical professor in the University of Texas Death Penalty Clinic, speak to us on a recent Friday. He gave us a brief history of the Clinic, and of his involvement in Death Row cases. Some readers may be in states that have not had any executions since the reinstitution of the death penalty, but Texas seems to be the leader in that dubious fraternity. As Prof. Owen talked about the cases, the attitude of courts and the public, and the clients themselves, I began to wonder how someone “hangs in” while doing that sort of work.

Public interest practice is a wellspring for reform of the entire legal profession

The old saw that "law is a conservative profession" is no excuse.

Upon entering the legal profession, I am acutely aware that women are in the minority. This is based on the number of women I've seen at my school and in my limited legal experience, as well as the treatment towards women and women's attitudes in the field. There are double standards for women, and women are often reluctant to address this. Starting from law school, it seems that women are more apprehensive to discuss the topic of law at all. Law school rewards confidence and aggressiveness, it seems, and unfortunately these traits are often more pronounced in men at school. However, the field of public interest is, in a lot of ways, contrary to corporate law and public interest carries a different set of attitudes towards women in the legal field. Public interest, as a result, is a more desirable field for women to be in, for a lot of reasons, and may be the source of change that is so desperately needed.

We have a duty to use our law degrees to advance women's rights

As women entering the legal profession, I believe we all have the duty to use our law degree to help advance the rights of women in some way. Before I even started law school at Catholic University, I knew that I wanted to use my law degree to advance women's rights. Since I have started law school my desire to provide legal services to the poor and underprivileged women has only strengthened.

International Human Rights Lawyering: Can I do my own gender justice?

My first year of law school has taught me there is no law. At least, there is no law that is not first experienced by and filtered through the participants to a case or a suit. Each complaint tells a story of men and women who have suffered. Sometimes they lose money, other times rights, and in the worst of cases, the victims lose their dignity and lives. Women experience "The Law" much differently than the men who construct it, and their stories must be told.

Public Interest: Woman-Friendly or Friendly Woman?

Are women attracted to public interest law because it is a friendlier environment for women? Rather, the opposite seems to be true. A 2004 study by Harvard Law students showed that twice the percentage of women than men said that “helping others” was one of the most important factors in choosing a career. Relatedly, women have achieved more top-level positions in the non-profit sector than in private law. This seems to imply that women are attracted to public interest law because they see it as a means to fulfill their desire to help others. But, does this also suggest that women see for-profit law as just that – for profit?

Will Rogers once said, “Make crime pay. Become a lawyer.” The above facts about women in public interest law beg the question of whether women see private law as embracing this adage, and not about justice and helping others.

Syndicate content

Login (to blog or comment)

Ms. JD Announcements

Stay informed on our latest news! Sign up for our newsletter!

Thanks to all who voted!

The ABA Blawg 100

The 2007 Weblog Awards

Corporate Sponsors

Arnold & Porter LLP
Cooley Godward Kronish LLP
Covington & Burling LLP
Hogan & Hartson
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Latham & Watkins LLP
McDermott Will & Emery LLP
McGuireWoods LLP
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Sidley Austin LLP
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
WilmerHale LLP
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz

* denotes a founding sponsor

Other Sponsors